Not every "problem" is a problem, and not every "solution" is a solution. I am also familiar with the teachings of the Vedic/Hindu faiths, and how it was meant to be interpreted. From my own subjective observations, I've notice how humans unnecessarily create problems to in order to create resolutions, where there are none, typically, to comes off or appear a certain way 'they are not'. In the respect to the Eastern view, question are subject to be open to both 'yes' and 'no' answers, in recognition of a nondualistic reality ("Advaita"). From the worldly perspective something can be 'true', but not be 'all the way true' ('Truth', as 'It' is), existing as partial degrees of what we call "truth".
We are not so much "forced" into the material world as we are subject to the condition of "ego-contamination", or what can be describe in the Vedic faith as "maya" or "illusion", which perpetuates "samsara" ("the cycle of birth and rebirth). We are subject to the karma we put out, by the use of our freewill, which must be returned to it's source, in accordance with "Cosmic Balance" and Universal Law, confirmed by science. Ultimately, freewill is the alignment with God/Spiritual Self (the impersonal), or the ego/material self (the personal). If that is so, history shows us which has been the most popular choice.
By fabricating problems, which come with made up solutions, we create more karma to undo, detracting from the obvious reality that 'Truth is all there ever is', and all there ever is to go by. We have to first discern if there is really a problem or not, before going about solving it, in which we must trace back to it's source. If you do not investigate deep enough, you may find a problem where there isn't one, or complete miss that you have one at all. From the Vedic standpoint, every problem with a source has it's solution that only needs discovery. Those without a source other than the imagination, can be disregarded as a hindrance, and only need to be seen for what they truly are.