I don't know about other universities, but symbolic logic courses are double-cataloged as math and philosophy courses at my university. Personally, I've only taken an informal logic class (which was obviously not math-like at all -- it was mostly familiarizing oneself with induction and the various fallacious arguments, cognitive biases, and so on) and intro to symbolic logic. Symbolic logic is somewhat math-like. Again, I don't know how far other universities take their intro to symbolic logic courses, but by the end of the class, we were doing some stuff with functors, identity statements, and the like. There was a little overlap. I've had math classes where the professor used some of the operators from symbolic logic.
Beyond that, though, intro level wasn't really like math. You could see the underlying relationship between symbolic logic and math, but it wasn't very challenging, in my opinion. The hardest part was getting the hang of doing the derivations, and once you get that, the rest is pretty much the same kind of thing but with new rules and features. I would imagine that if you're really good at math, you won't find logic very challenging, although you may find it interesting.
Maybe higher up logic courses and meta-logic would be more math-like. I honestly can't say from personal knowledge or experience. Sorry I can't be more helpful than that. I personally really enjoyed symbolic logic. If I'd had the chance to take higher level logic courses, I would have been all over it, but I didn't get the chance. We had cutbacks in our phil department, and they haven't been offering the higher level logic courses the last few semesters.