Multiple choice?

Question

The following argument says that natural processes in the universe are sufficient to produce life, and as such, God is an unnecessary complication.
Argument from Anthropology
Monkey-Typewriter Argument
Argument from Evil
Argument from Silence
Argument from Incompatible Attributes
None of the above

Answer 1

The closest best answer is the Monkeys & their Typewriters argument. Also, it is well to note the ironic perspective of an argument from incredulity implicit in the question.



Related: http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/designun.html



Re the Monkeys: astronomer Sir Fred Hoyle states "Commonsense interpretation of the facts is that a super-intelligence has MONKEYED [emphasis added] with physics, as well as chemistry and biology, and that there are no blind forces in nature."

Answer 2

G. Epicurus' Trilemma.

Answer 3

Well why don't you first just eliminate the ones that are OBVIOUSLY not right, like "Argument from Evil" and "Argument from Silence"? Then you can look up the others and see which fits.

Answer 4

There is no God. Even if he is there, he will not like to interfere in our personal affairs.