Philosophy As Domestic Bliss? He Said, She Said ... #3?

Question

She loves him because he loves her.
He loves her because she loves him.

Can you apply philosophy, or a specific philosophical (not psychological) term, to define the basis for their supposed bliss? It's there and it's applicable to life beyond their lives.

Do you see anything wrong with this relationship? Or is everything spiffy?

(See what happens when you let yourself get bored? I think i'm going to go write the great American novel now. Thank those of you who have played along.)

Answer 1

The only thing I can think of similar to this is a passage in the New Testament- "We love because He first loved us." (Referring to humanity and God, of course.) And in Jane Austen's novel 'Pride and Prejudice' a character observes how few of us have the courage to really be in love with a member of the opposite sex if we receive no encouragement from the other party. I suppose the greatest attraction is some one who is already attracted to you. It's too flattering to resist.

Answer 2

To be frank, monks make a lot money from gullible those with "merchandising campaign delivers". mom's father replaced top right into a Baptist pastor, so i replaced into taken to his church from start up. the ultimate time I attended it, there have been 3 series plates surpassed around for extensive-unfold and specail offering and progression fund. on a similar time as i replaced top right into a small newborn, one series replaced into sufficient. Grandfather drove modest autos and owned in uncomplicated terms modest outfits and watches. via skill of now, some preachers decide on Cadillacs and Rolexes. i purchase my own matters greater advantageous severe priced than this, e.g. Patek Philippe watches that fee 4 situations as much as comparable Rolexes, yet I won't purchase any con guy a bicycle and a Timex. I see no decide on for clergy. My grandfather taught college as correct as preached. all clergy would have clever jobs and not con each and each guy or woman with delivers of an after lifestyles that does now no longer exist, and if it did, no person might like it.

Answer 3

Spurious Philosophy

Answer 4

Technically, I think it's impossible. Without someone loving the other for reasons other than returned love, the cycle wouldn't start. I don't think it would apply if both people started to love each other at once, on the promise that they would be loved in return. Instead, they're falling in love with their promise?

Answer 5

Dude