Question:
If you try to imitate the original, you will always be exposed as the generic?
NP
2010-02-03 21:22:35 UTC
Everytie you try to emulate yourself as the original version of someone else instead of bieng the original of yourself, then you will always be exposed as the genric version of the individual you tried to become the original of, or you'll always be nothing ore than the generic version and nothing more.

If you try to ake yourself appear as the solid copy of the individual, then you will always be exposed as the transparent copy meaning that people can easily see through you hence the meaning of transparent, if you were the solid copy of yourself then no-one will be able to see through you at all.

Do you agree or disagree?
Six answers:
peter_unk
2010-02-03 21:42:42 UTC
I'd say the self is transparent. Looking at self there is illumination. When you say people see through you it is because they are not actually looking, and it is their long vision of something outside of a human, something on their mind, some abstract goal, that their brain is focussed on. Many people profess to understand people, or to know what is on their minds. This is but a knowledge of the fragmented self. It is an observation of a separate self, which is you, me, I, and I can know this because it is me. You acknowledge it because you, I, me, are of the mind of a fragmented self. This is a false consciousness.
Answer Master
2010-02-03 21:26:35 UTC
Yes. You generic Bozo
2010-02-03 21:26:23 UTC
no one can ever be original, its always been done already, now that that's settled, go make me a sandwich
2010-02-03 21:35:12 UTC
here is my rule: don't follow others, lead them
2010-02-03 21:28:52 UTC
http://www.cooltoknow.net/categories/philosophy_and_concepts/
2010-02-03 21:26:54 UTC
Not always.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...