Does this philosophy fit or am I totally delusional?

Question

As Nihilist Deists we ask ourselves what are some world creating and destroying details along with how and when and where was it all created if indeed created at all ? in addition what position does human conscientiousness place in it all , if at all ?? hmm very loaded questions which may or may not require answers better than any we think we know or are even possible to know here and now in our universal space time experience , however we feel it is every humans responsibilities to at least attempt an answer at these

the greatest questions , which will be that until answered definitively and unilaterally henceforth vindicated factual reality ergo universally accepted as truth .

Baring our continued survival in the cosmos at large , it is known that we will eventually evolve into a species or species unrecognizable today using human based faculties systematically evolving into coldness-likeability and possibly cryo-sustainability after entropic heat loss occurs .

Biologically supported and factual through observations it is known that eyes do evolve spontaneously and independently of each other , we are the top primates undeniable with modern archaeological and genetic evidence , indicating a primary line branched into lineage on early earth forming the tree of life we see today , we examine the marvelous fractal patterns and physical symmetries all earth based organisms develop in response to any one said universal law .

We believe the intro-verses intrinsically link themselves with " exo-verses " collectively known as the multi-verses , exact and similar copies of us likely do exist , holographic boundaries in space time do appear to actually exist indicating our collective experiences may indeed be determined-conscientious conterminously ergo conspicuously holographicallistically simulated meaning we believe everything is predestined every quantum-string in every singularity ever in existence has been programmed like a tree seed that blossoms into a tree from a point of infinite smallness to infinite largeness back again , we believe this is true for all beings and matter alike from the quantum scale to the macro scale and every point in between , to understand a singularity one might be best understand the geometric nature of an orb or a sphere then reversing it this is a singularity .
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I founded Nihilistic Deisticism , it is a view that we are likely molecules in motion no more no less , do you remember before you were born ? We return to nature likely with no soul . We only get one chance with no before or after life , therefore self preservation both cryogenic and eventually cyber-consciously is a spec-ial ergo an individuals responsibility . please consider Nihilistic Deisticism as a possible explanation for any said entity our existence and non-existence also realize that it is undetermined whether or not any said entity is within our space time or outside , our view is it likely exists outside space time and whether or not said entity alters any one singularity after the big bang materializes space time and matter into existence it is our view that zero is the exact middle of positive infinity and negative infinity and that true nothingness is where it all begins likely from the intro-verse itself which is likely spherical and separated from our dimension by the holographic membrane boundary layer between intro-verses , uni-verses , and multi-verses alike .

Perhaps I can enlighten you , a Nihilist Deist believes an entity may exist in in-organic form that is infinitely small therefore able to spontaneously materialize from the immaterial spawning existence furthermore evolving into and under laws of nature not yet understood , from the physical evidence observed we can say in-definitively that this entity , is an " It " versus a he or she , evidential and most notably this entity likely enjoys both extremes of it's creation . This is more plausible than any one said Philosophy or Dogma or World View in our view however any one said Philosophy or Dogma or World View may be correct however unlikely in our view .
__________________________________________________________________

The greatest question will most likely be definitively answered in all or one of these three ways :

A . " It " reveals itself .
B . Advanced spec-ial indoctrination from them to us occurs .
C . A Law of nature not yet understood revealing it's formation becomes understood .

Answer 1

I would be very skeptical about how your brain is operating right now, your thoughts seem very jumbled and abstract to the point of being incomprehensible. I understand though, I have had similar thoughts, right down to holographic membrane yada yada entropy yada yada singularity. There is probably a grain of truth behind what you're saying, but it's such an abstraction away from daily concerns that it probably isn't even worth thinking about yet.



I was mildly psychotic because of the medication I was taking (plus the weed), and was having all sorts of amazing ideas about the nature of reality as well as the paranoia and hallucinations. I'm still not sure if any of it was true or not, but it made so much sense.



I would consider seeing a psychologist or something if I were you.



Edit: I'm not sure, it's very strange how similar your thoughts are to the ones I had, you've invented your own little language to talk about it that I can sort of understand, althought you lose me when you start talking about intro-verses and exoverses. You're obviously very much into physics and mathematics like I am.



EDIT AGAIN: so yeah, I would say your philosophy fits, at least partially, but you're also probably totally delusional at the same time.

Answer 2

I feed my dog wellbeing puppy foods, it has first-class fine factors and i take into account it is moderately priced. Different brands you may also desire to look at are cast Gold, instinct, Evolve also are pleasant meals too.

Answer 3

(A) the knights Ni, whom at the crossing of King Arthur had briefly changed their name to something far less ubiquitous, (B) had forgotten to change "it" to something far more complicated as well, and suffered for such (C). but this is just a popular version of what may of actually happened in some way (D)

Answer 4

Can't both be true ?

Answer 5

Ok