Question:
Can one prove that no relationship exists between science and the indestructible properties like divisibility?
The Knowledge Server
2009-08-07 19:30:57 UTC
1.What is the relationship between science and the indestructible properties? Can one prove that no relationship exists between science and the indestructible properties like divisibility?
2.What is the relationship between philosophy and the indestructible properties? Can one prove that no relationship exists between philosophy and the indestructible properties like divisibility?
3.What is the relationship between human mind and the indestructible properties? Can one prove that no relationship exists between human mind and the indestructible properties like divisibility?
4.What is the relationship between evolution and the indestructible properties? Can one prove that no relationship exists between evolution and the indestructible properties like divisibility?
5.What is the relationship between education and the indestructible properties? Can one prove that no relationship exists between education and the indestructible properties like divisibility?

The list of indestructible properties can be found at:
http ://www. wikihow. com/Be-an-Analyst
[just remove the extraspaces in the URL]
Seven answers:
Wesley B
2009-08-07 19:47:05 UTC
1. None.

You don't prove a negative. It is up to YOU to prove that there IS a connection and that the "indestructible properties" aren't just made up gibberish.



2. None.

You don't prove a negative. It is up to YOU to prove that there IS a connection and that the "indestructible properties" aren't just made up gibberish.



3. None.

You don't prove a negative. It is up to YOU to prove that there IS a connection and that the "indestructible properties" aren't just made up gibberish.



4. None.

You don't prove a negative. It is up to YOU to prove that there IS a connection and that the "indestructible properties" aren't just made up gibberish.



5. None.

You don't prove a negative. It is up to YOU to prove that there IS a connection and that the "indestructible properties" aren't just made up gibberish.



All you do is come in here as ask people to prove no connection exists or to discuss what connections might exist, yet you won't ever even do the basic courtesy of defining the terms. And the definitions on that site are wholly unsatisfactory.



Please translate "Divisibility is the property without which one can neither be a part nor be a whole. Nothing can be quantified in an indivisible universe" into something usable? Like plain English? This doesn't mean anything. It talks in circles and none of the terms are defined. WHY can't a thing be a part or a whole without this property? WHY can nothing be quantified in an indivisible universe?

Please rephrase this in plain, everyday English if you want thoughtful commentary.
Envy
2009-08-07 19:43:28 UTC
1) There is a huge relationship with science and indestructible properties. Science is ANALYSIS of nature.



2) Philosophy, on the other hand, is a bit abstract since it centers on the conscious understanding of the human mind(which is abstract) to what it sees. Therefore, it doesn't normally use much of the Analysis, but it still does



3) The human mind, is abstract and it centers on its understanding of unconscious things, therefore everything unconscious can be analyzed to what a human understands it as.



4) Evolution is based on observation and is a scientific finding. See number 1



5) Education is cutting up the indestructible properties of an object or idea and feeding them to people piece by piece



------

I'm sorry if I didn't answer your question right. xD
James
2009-08-07 19:39:22 UTC
It is more than a little difficult to get what you are asking here.



You link to what looks like a list of pointers to help analyze something. These "indestructible properties" basically seem like a list of common sense type things that anyone that has ever thought a problem over probably uses without thinking about it.



I would guess the answer to all of your questions would be the same; the "indestructible properties" help examine and analyze any thing to do with anything in any of the fields/areas you mentioned.
glenn123
2009-08-07 20:00:09 UTC
No. A subjective mind will allow itself to find a suitable relation between any objects or concepts because relativity is the true indestructable force.



No matter where you stand, figuratively or literally, your observation is a relative position. It will relate because you intend for it to be so....and there is a (possibly) infinite amount of ways to compare it to every other thing.
anonymous
2016-05-28 03:26:36 UTC
Science can create indestructible properties where more science gets born.
Tenacious V
2009-08-07 21:32:53 UTC
Take it to the science section and see where that toilet flushes it...
geyamala
2009-08-08 10:54:45 UTC
nobody can prove it.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...