Do this has any connection with philosophy?

Question

Simple Philosophy of Statistics:

Jessica had fallen in love with Siva. I made this statement since I am the friend of Jessica. What is the basis upon which I made the statement “Jessica had fallen in love with Siva,” how I made the statement “Jessica had fallen in love with Siva,” how can I make a statement to reveal how close Jessica and Siva are, and how can one verify the statement “Jessica had fallen in love with Siva” is called as statistics by the learned people in the academic institutions. Statistics is the art of making, verifying and validating statements.


What is the basis upon which I made the statement?

The basis upon which I made the statement is observation – frequent observation of Jessica and Siva together. If I would have observed them once or twice, I would not have made the statement “Jessica had fallen in love with Siva.” I have observed them together frequently here and there. How frequently I have observed them together is called as frequency of observation. So, based on the frequency of observation I made the statement “Jessica had fallen in love with Siva.”


How close are they?

How close are Jessica and Siva? Are they very close? Are they just together? I can answer this question only by comparing with the standard love histories. Is it a normal love? Is it an abnormal love? [Comparing your observation with the help of standard curves like normal curve and other distribution curves]


How can one verify and validate that Jessica had fallen in love with Siva?

Am I a liar? Is my statement “Jessica had fallen in love with Siva” false? Is it an insignificant statement? If my statement is true and significant, one can expect Jessica and Siva to be together. If one observes Jessica and Siva together, my statement is true and significant. [Expected and observed Values]. If my statement is false or erratic, then what is expected will not be observed. The difference between the expected and observed values is called as „error value‟ by the great, great statisticians.


Everyone who could not understand this simple explanation would never understand the big, big, boopie statistic books or lectures by hotties on statistics!!

Answer 1

NO.



I think you are overrating yourself by saying"Everyone who could not understand this simple explanation would never understand the big, big, boopie statistic books or lectures by hotties on statistics!!"



Your statement "Statistics is the art of making, verifying and validating statements." has been prompted to be said by you because you believe in that as a commonly accepted norm readily accepted by a set of people who matters in the society as truth.



Similar social norms, traditions and practices accept your credibility as the yardstick to believe what you said as truth and statistically correct and acceptable when you say "Jessica has fallen in love with Shiva" as a true statement. Whereas no human beings can know the intensity of love one person has for the other, whatever be the compelling conditions like meeting a thousand times or talking sweet things. It can be true only when kept vis-a-vis certain values the society has accepted as truth and valuable, whereas it can always be false. In order to know the molecules of love in the body of Jessica as well as Siva one has to be inside each molecules of love inside each of the person. This is possible only if you are omnipresent or if you are God. The rest of everything are nearest approximation according to the norms established and if the matter comes within the four boundary walls of those norms and traditions would be evaluated as statistics. All statistics are close approximation within the powers of perception of the five sensory organs. Man is imperfect. Human mind is imperfect. Perfection is only in the mind of God.

Answer 2

guess i'll never understand the big,big boopie statistic book

or lecture by hotties on statistics

but, my best to jessica and siva anyhow...

Answer 3

HOLY! 172! Dude, mine is in basic terms 117, and ninety-one hundred ten is conventional...I opt to earnings variety you! Mine could be better if I acually did the artwork, this is borring and consumer-friendly, so I in basic terms ordinary do no longer do it, why ought to I? i'm in basic terms an different banquet for the goverment leaches that thieve your money in the variety of "taxes" and the goverment is so hypocritical, "There are 2 inivitable issues in existence, dying and taxes" i myself think of I ought to have been in that 172 section, my existence is depressing and that i opt to esacpe this tourture placed on me via my instructors, I "act" much less clever than anybody else by using fact I choose i replaced into the two smarter so i ought to locate away out of my existence without killing my self or working away, or dumber so i does not relise whats forward. sure I comprehend that my speling is off and that i will no longer be able to spell. i'm unlikely to apply spell verify to teach you all why i'm caught at 117! If purely there replaced right into a kit u ought to get that replaced into an entire I.Q. attempt to had the variety to boost...i will no longer be able to belive which you acquire 172 in 4th grade! i myself choose that the percentages for that have been in my choose, or a minimum of a few one that clever could %. a activity as like a tutour, no longer asserting you ought to, in basic terms asserting I choose that i ought to attain your point...At this value i visit in no way finished my objectives...i could choose for to alter into some variety of application dissiener that turns into somewhat rich somewhat rapid and for an prolonged volume of time, that way i could no longer purely get what i could choose for, yet additionally supply to thouse who choose for it...

Answer 4

Cool story bro.