Question:
can you tell me similarities and differneces between representative(indirect) realism and idealism please!!!!?
stufrazer_1
2007-01-12 02:31:58 UTC
can you tell me the similarities and differneces between representative (indirect) realism and idealism please!!!!
Five answers:
Karma Chimera
2007-01-12 02:36:59 UTC
Yes, this question is really about theories of how we perceive the world. Representative Theory of Perception, also known as Indirect realism and epistemological dualism, is a philosophical concept. It states that we do not (and can not) perceive the external world directly; instead we know only our ideas or interpretations of objects in the world. However, an indirect realist believes our ideas come from sense data of a real, material, external world (unlike idealists). The doctrine states that in any act of perception, the immediate (direct) object of perception is only a sense-datum that represents an external object.



This immediately raises a question: How well do sense-data represent external objects, properties, and events? Indirect realism creates deep epistemological problems, such as solipsism and the problem of the external world. Nonetheless, Indirect realism has been popular in the history of philosophy and has been developed by many philosophers including Bertrand Russell, Spinoza, René Descartes, and John Locke.





Whereas, Idealism is a class of positions in ontology and epistemology. Idealism as an epistemological position asserts that everything we experience is of a mental nature. That is, we can only have direct, immediate knowledge of the contents of our mind. We can never directly know or experience an external object itself. As an ontological position Idealism asserts either that only minds and the objects of mind exist, or that everything is composed of mental realities (e.g., thoughts, feelings, perceptions, ideas, or will). As a foundation for cosmology, or an approach to understanding the nature of existence, idealism is often contrasted with materialism, both belonging to the class of monist as opposed to dualist or pluralist ontologies. (Note that this contrast between idealism and materialism is approximately as to whether the substance of the world is at base mental or physical — it has nothing to do with thinking that things should be idealized, or with coveting goods.)



So, representative realism says we CAN perceive the world, but that we do it indirectly.



And idealism says that we CAN NEVER perceive the objective physical world because such a world doesn't exist. The whole of reality is mental.
umberger
2016-12-09 03:06:13 UTC
Similarities Between Idealism And Realism
?
2016-12-12 14:46:44 UTC
You mischaracterize philosophical realism and philosophical idealism. You look pertaining to political realism and idealism, and as such this question must be in politics. Philosophical idealism is the view that life is in basic terms strategies-based, that's, that the only issues that exist are suggestions. Realism is the view that life is strategies-autonomous, that's, is an exterior international that persists and is how that's besides the fact that we predict of roughly it. considering that one view says all life is strategies-based, and the different says all life is strategies autonomous, the only "middle floor" is substance dualism, the thought the international of suggestions and the international of tangible issues the two exist. Descartes famously recommended this view, in spite of the shown fact that it is so riddled with quite severe conceptual issues that it is not taken substantially taken heavily as a philosophical view. the excuses that it is not taken heavily are often rehashed in creation to philosophy classes via fact they themselves are interesting themes.
bob c
2007-01-14 11:52:44 UTC
This is the basic problem with philosophy.. (see the first answer.)

The sheer quantity of words and notions there make the concepts described inpenetrable and unless you allow yourself to be drawn into the false realm of words they will be of no use to you at all.



Take Ludwig Wittgenstein own advice, give up on philosophy and go and do something practical, then you may truly learn something .



Philosophy is ruled by semantics .
anonymous
2007-01-14 11:45:04 UTC
to educated for me.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...