I believe it began as an art statement for the Avant-garde: the future is perceivable like a work of art, In the now, Of the now, For the now, a kind of statement about the futility of the future, it is actually more real for the future to exist now, as though Now is the self, and Future is a work of art in the middle of the room; other things are more serious, but they are not more urgent, somehow they are not definitive
I agree with a lot the previous posts on the meaning.
It can be explained in terms of Anticipation, Action, and Need, as though resources are located only in the future, but also as though the present is "ever-reaching", it is poetic based, it "seeks for answers" and it "finds problems". Action is travel, translation, communication, a state of flux. It is as though the communicator is in the future.
Avant-gardists keep finding their statements stated or situated like that: The communicator is in the future, the art is before us, techniques are members of judgment, or something, it gets sort of crazy, its like an addictive drug.
But that aside, it is an interesting approach valued for not being very blind about ideas.